Systematic review reveals ozone impacts sports performance in athletes, suggesting need for air quality awareness.
Laboratory studies suggest that high concentrations of particles matter (diameter<2.5 mm [PM 2.5 ]) and ozone (O 3 ) may reduce sport performances at short term. However, a systematic review of literature examining whether air pollution has an effect on sport performances in real situations is missing. Seven databases were searched for articles which examined the association between particulate (PM 2.5 , PM 10 , PM Coarse ), gaseous (O 3 , sulfur dioxide [SO 2 ], nitrogen dioxide [NO 2 ], carbon monoxide [CO], and index (Air Quality Index [AQI]) of air pollutants and sport performances in real context. We included observational studies with objective measures of air pollution and performances. They were categorized into endurance, power/speed, technical performances. Harvest plots were used to summarize the findings. When appropriate, meta-analyses were completed to evaluate the strength of the associations. Over 200 reported associations from 23 articles were examined. Participants were primarily elite athletes. The majority of studies examined football (n = 9), and endurance sports (n = 10). Overall, no consistent associations were observed for AQI, PM 2.5 , or NO₂ and performances. We found that exposure to O 3 was associated with reduced sports performance, ( d = -0.33, 95%CI: -0.65 –0.02 [all performances]; d = -0.54, 95%CI: -1.02 -0.04) [endurance performances]). An absence of significant association between AQI, PM 2.5 , or NO 2 exposure and sports performance is supported by our systematic review and meta-analyses, although results were not entirely consistent across methods. Higher O 3 concentration could impair sport performances in real context. For short-term exposures to CO, PM 10 , and SO₂, no definitive conclusions can be drawn due to the limited number of studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bernard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: