Investigates crystal phase effects on hydrogen production efficiency in electrocatalysts, suggesting improved designs.
Phase engineering has proved effective in enhancing electrocatalytic performance by precisely controlling crystal structures. While significant efforts have been dedicated to phase regulation of active metals, the role of crystal phase of catalyst supports in steering the hydrogen migration during hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) remains underexplored. This work systematically investigates zirconium dioxide in its monoclinic ( m -ZrO 2 ) and tetragonal ( t -ZrO 2 ) phases as supports for Ru nanoclusters. A combination of spectroscopy and theoretical calculation demonstrates strong electronic metal–support interactions and work function difference between Ru and m -ZrO 2 lead to interfacial charge accumulation, accelerated water dissociation, and reverse hydrogen spillover, significantly enhancing electrocatalytic HER performance in alkaline medium. The Ru@ m -ZrO 2 /C catalyst exhibits excellent HER activity in different electrolytes. It achieves 10 mA cm −2 with an extremely low overpotential (η 10 ) of only 28 mV in 1 M KOH, delivering a mass activity of 2.72 A mg Ru −1 (at 50 mV overpotential), which is 45 times higher than that of commercial Pt/C. The η 10 values are 56, 42, and 30 mV in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 , 1 M KOH + 2 M NaCl, and 1 M KOH + simulated seawater, respectively. Furthermore, the catalyst also demonstrates excellent stability under alkaline simulated seawater electrolysis conditions. When integrated into an anion-exchange membrane water electrolyzer, it achieves 1.0 A cm −2 at 1.76 V with stability exceeding 300 h. This work underscores the pivotal importance of support phase engineering for designing high-performance electrocatalysts for water splitting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: