Randomized trial explores communication strategies for addressing medical aid in dying in nursing practice, suggesting frameworks for better patient care.
Medical aid in dying (MAiD) has become an increasingly visible component of end-of-life care in the United States as legal access expands across multiple jurisdictions. As MAiD becomes more integrated into serious illness care, nurses, particularly those in hospice and palliative care, are increasingly the first clinicians to receive patient questions about this option. These inquiries are often embedded in broader concerns related to suffering, loss of autonomy, fear of prolonged dying, and desire for control rather than solely requests for hastened death. The Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association's recent position statement on medical aid in dying emphasizes compassionate, nonjudgmental care, respect for autonomy, professional integrity, and the ethical obligation of nonabandonment while recognizing the complexities of conscientious objection. Despite this guidance, practical communication strategies for nurses responding to MAiD-related inquiries remain limited. This manuscript examines the evolving legal and ethical landscape of MAiD, explores the professional implications for nursing practice, and introduces the EXPLORE (Elicit, Explore, Probe Suffering, Learn Values, Observe Pressures, Review Support, Evaluate Next Steps) communication framework, a practice-based model developed to provide nurses with a structured, evidence-informed approach for responding to patient-initiated MAiD discussions. As MAiD becomes more prevalent, structured communication frameworks may strengthen nursing competence and improve patient-centered care in ethically complex end-of-life conversations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ford et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: