Demonstrates effective damage classification in structures, highlighting improved identification under low data quality.
Accurate structural damage identification under limited data availability and measurement noise remains a persistent challenge in structural health monitoring (SHM). This study proposes TLCA-RATNet, a transfer learning-enhanced residual attention temporal network for vibration-based damage state classification under noisy and small sample conditions. RATNet integrates adaptive threshold residual denoising, residual attention, and bidirectional gated recurrent unit (BiGRU)-based temporal modeling to suppress noise, emphasize damage-sensitive features, and capture global temporal dependencies. The current implementation is formulated as a single-task classifier, in which local feature refinement and global temporal representation are jointly optimized end-to-end through a unified damage classification objective. Transfer learning further initializes the target domain model using knowledge learned from a data-rich source structure, while regularized fine-tuning reduces overfitting on limited target samples. Experiments were conducted on a six-story lumped-mass shear structure, a three-story physical frame, and the IASC-ASCE SHM benchmark structure, using 10–145 training samples per damage class and additive-noise conditions ranging from 0 to 30 dB signal-to-noise ratio. On Dataset 2 at 5 dB, TLCA-RATNet achieved an accuracy of 89.86%, exceeding LSTM and CNN-BiGRU by 9.94 and 13.10 percentage points, respectively. On Dataset 3 at 0 dB, it achieved 86.00% accuracy, outperforming CNN-BiGRU by 10.72 percentage points. In the limited sample transfer experiment on Dataset 2, transfer learning increased the accuracy from 93.05% to 100.00%, representing a gain of 6.95 percentage points over training from scratch. These results indicate that TLCA-RATNet provides a data-efficient and noise-robust approach for damage state screening and rapid model adaptation in SHM applications with scarce labeled data and noisy measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: