Examines chemotherapy-driven heterogeneity in ovarian cancer, suggesting personalized treatments improve outcomes.
In women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, chemotherapy remains the primary standard treatment, despite growing recognition of the disease as highly heterogeneous. Here, we examine the feasibility and clinical utility of comprehensive multimodal molecular profiling to inform treatment decisions. We analyze blood, single-cell and bulk tumor tissue, and malignant ascites using up to eleven technologies (DNA, RNA, protein, and functional assays) within a four-week turnaround time. Hypothetical treatment recommendations are altered for 76% of patients, and multi-omics-guided maintenance therapy is associated with prolonged overall survival in a subset of patients. Subsequent cohort analysis reveals distinct cellular and molecular profiles in ascites-derived single-cells compared to solid tumor tissue, unique per-patient ex vivo drug responses, and a marked increase in cancer cell heterogeneity following chemotherapy exposure. This coincides with genomic signature alterations in whole-genome-amplified patients. Our data suggest that molecularly guided treatments should be tested as adjuvant therapies prior to chemotherapy in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacob et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: