Experimental study examines evacuation choices at bottlenecks in deep underground spaces, highlighting key influences on behavior.
Due to enclosed space, long evacuation distances, and complex path structures, key nodes in deep underground spaces are prone to forming bottlenecks during fire evacuation. To collect evacuation behavior data at potential bottlenecks, an interactive video-based hypothetical choice (HC) experiment was conducted with 104 valid samples. Exit distance, sub-safe zone setting, congestion, pedestrian flow guidance, and smoke were systematically examined. The results showed that: (a) exit distance, sub-safe zone setting, congestion at the nearest exit, and smoke significantly affected evacuation decisions, with clear avoidance of near-exit congestion and smoke; (b) congestion on paths to non-nearest exits had a relatively weak effect, and pedestrian flow guidance did not produce significant herding; and (c) gender, age, professional background, and evacuation experience influenced path choice differences under certain conditions. Notably, evacuees prioritized smoke avoidance over all other cues, while congestion triggered non-compensatory route switching rather than herding behavior. These findings enrich the empirical database on pedestrian evacuation dynamics in deep underground spaces and provide a quantitative basis for evacuation simulation, spatial optimization, and safety management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: