Correction identifies GM-249 as ICS-1 in cacao, highlighting genetic background's role in expressions.
Guiltinan, M.J., Landherr, L., Maximova, S.N., DelVecchio, D., Sebastian, A. and Albert, I. (2026) Reduced Susceptibility to Phytophthora in Non-Transgenic Cacao Progeny Through CRISPR–Cas9 Mediated TcNPR3 Mutagenesis. Plant Biotechnology Journal 24: 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.70365 In the originally published article, the line designated GM-249 was identified as the cacao genotype Scavina-6 (Sca-6) and was used as a non-edited reference in the transcriptome analysis and as the pollen parent in one of the reported crosses. Whole-genome sequencing of the experimental genotypes has since established that GM-249 is the cacao clone ICS-1, not Scavina-6. The misidentification originated as a labeling error on the source plant and was detected only once genome-scale data became available; the corrected identity has been confirmed by whole-genome sequence comparison. The correction changes the genotype label of GM-249 from “Scavina-6 (Sca-6)” to “ICS-1” in Table 1, the relevant figures and the supplementary materials, and in the description of the cross in which GM-249 (ICS-1) served as the pollen parent. A corrected Table 1 accompanies this correction. This reassignment does not alter the study's principal conclusions. The most strongly supported and reproducible differential-expression signal derives from comparisons among lines in the PSU-Scavina-6 background, which do not involve GM-249 and are therefore unaffected. The corrected identity indicates that comparisons involving GM-249 span a more genetically divergent background than originally stated, which is consistent with, and reinforces, the paper's caution that genetic-background heterogeneity contributes substantially to the observed transcriptional variation. No quantitative result, figure, or conclusion other than the GM-249 genotype label requires revision. We apologize for this error.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: