Key result
STEMI care at secondary hospitals is linked to similar in-hospital mortality compared to tertiary centers.
Why the study?
Differences in reperfusion treatment and outcomes for STEMI between secondary and tertiary hospitals in predominantly rural central China were not well characterized.
Does treatment at secondary hospitals compared to tertiary hospitals affect in-hospital outcomes in patients with STEMI in rural central China?
Observational (n=5,063)
Yes
Does treatment at secondary hospitals compared to tertiary hospitals affect in-hospital outcomes in patients with STEMI in rural central China?
Despite higher reliance on fibrinolysis and significant delays, risk-adjusted in-hospital outcomes for STEMI patients in secondary hospitals were comparable to those in tertiary hospitals in rural central China.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports STEMI care at secondary hospitals in rural settings; leaves open optimal regional reperfusion networks and long-term outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in reperfusion treatment and outcomes between secondary and tertiary hospitals in predominantly rural central China. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective and observational study. SETTING: Sixty-six (50 secondary and 16 tertiary) hospitals in Henan province, central China. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 30 days of symptom onset during 2016-2018. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital mortality, and in-hospital death or treatment withdrawal. RESULTS: Among 5063 patients of STEMI, 2553 were treated at secondary hospitals. Reperfusion (82.0% vs 73.0%, p<0.001) including fibrinolytic therapy (70.3% vs 4.4%, p<0.001) were more preformed, whereas primary percutaneous coronary intervention (11.7% vs 68.6%, p<0.001) were less frequent at secondary hospitals. In secondary hospitals, 53% received fibrinolytic therapy 3 hours after onset, and 5.8% underwent coronary angiography 2-24 hours after fibrinolysis. Secondary hospitals had a shorter onset-to-first-medical-contact time (176 min vs 270 min, p<0.001). Adjusted in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.70, p=0.210) and in-hospital death or treatment withdrawal (adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.70, p=0.361) were similar between secondary and tertiary hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: With fibrinolytic therapy as the main reperfusion strategy, the reperfusion rate was higher in secondary hospitals, whereas in-hospital outcomes were similar compared with tertiary hospitals. Public awareness, capacity of primary and secondary care institutes to treat STEMI, and establishment of deeper cooperation among different-level healthcare institutes need to further improve. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02641262.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) conducted an observational in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=5,063). Treatment at secondary hospitals vs. Treatment at tertiary hospitals was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.89-1.70, p=0.210). Treatment at secondary hospitals for STEMI was associated with more frequent use of fibrinolytic therapy and a similar risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality compared to tertiary hospitals (adjusted OR 1.23).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: