Key result
Continuity of care in cardiac rehabilitation addresses fragmented care to optimize coronary artery disease outcomes.
Why the study?
Does applying a continuity of care framework in cardiac rehabilitation improve patient care delivery for patients with coronary artery disease?
Does applying a continuity of care framework in cardiac rehabilitation improve patient care delivery for patients with coronary artery disease?
This guide provides a structured framework to improve continuity of care in cardiac rehabilitation, addressing administrative and structural barriers to patient referral, progression, and completion.
Supports continuity frameworks to address cardiac rehabilitation gaps; hypothesis-generating for outcome gains pending prospective validation.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of disease burden worldwide. Referral to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a class I recommendation for all patients with CAD based on findings that participation can reduce cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, as well as improve functional capacity and quality of life. However, programme uptake remains low, systematic progression through the traditional CR phases is often lacking, and communication between health care providers is frequently suboptimal, resulting in fragmented care. Only 30% to 50% of eligible patients are typically referred to outpatient CR and fewer still complete the programme. In contemporary models of CR, patients are no longer treated by a single practitioner, but rather by an array of health professionals, across multiples specialities and health care settings. The risk of fragmented care in CR may be great, and a concerted approach is required to achieve continuity and optimise patient outcomes. 'Continuity of care' has been described as the delivery of services in a coherent, logical, and timely fashion and which entails 3 specific domains: informational, management, and relational continuity. This is examined in the context of CR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giuliano et al. (2017) conducted a review in Coronary Artery Disease. Continuity of care framework in cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated. Implementing informational, management, and relational continuity of care in cardiac rehabilitation is required to overcome fragmented care and optimize patient outcomes in coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: