Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper develops a general theory to recover the inverse welfare function that rationalizes a given tax schedule as optimal. Our theory allows for complex environments including the presence of multidimensional tax schedules, bunching/jumping behavior, optimization frictions, general equilibrium effects, and externalities. We show that inverse welfare functions can be used to test for Pareto efficiency, construct Pareto improving reforms, and characterize the set of welfare improving local reforms, thereby extending previous results to more general environments. We show numerically that allowing for such generalities can have meaningful impacts on inverse welfare functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergstrom et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: