Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates motivations for Holocaust site visitation in Poland, revealing a complex configuration of engagement types.
Holocaust memorial sites occupy a central position within global tourism and transnational cultures of remembrance. Although dark tourism scholarship frequently frames visitation as a form of moral pedagogy – progressing from historical learning to ethical reflection and emotional transformation – empirical evidence regarding the structural organization of visitor motivations remains limited. This study examines the configurational architecture of engagement at major Holocaust-related sites in present-day Poland. Drawing on survey data from 1,071 international visitors and applying exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses alongside comparative structural modeling, the research evaluates whether motivations are best represented as a unified construct, a hierarchical structure, or differentiated domains. The findings identify a five-factor structure – Morbid Curiosity, Exploration-Adventure Motivation, Reflective-Emotional Engagement, Moral-Commemorative Responsibility, and Historical-Educational Motivation – with satisfactory model fit and low inter-factor correlations. Alternative unidimensional and higher-order specifications do not provide superior explanatory value. Structural path analysis further indicates weak and statistically non-significant cross-domain effects. Overall, the results do not support a hierarchical or progressive ordering of engagement. Instead, Holocaust visitation is more adequately characterized as a differentiated configuration of coexisting motivational orientations, contributing a configurational perspective to scholarship on memory, cultural change, and ethically charged tourism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vujko et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: