Evaluates malignancy prediction in thyroid nodules using Ki-67 and K-TIRADS, suggesting a new stratification tool.
Background/Objectives: Preoperative risk stratification of indeterminate thyroid nodules, particularly category IV nodules diagnosed as follicular neoplasm, remains challenging. Molecular testing may support clinical decision-making, but its cost and limited availability restrict routine use. This study evaluated whether the digitally quantified Ki-67 labeling index, alone and combined with the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS), could predict malignancy in thyroid core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 130 thyroid nodules sampled by ultrasound-guided CNB. The Ki-67 labeling index was digitally quantified in immunohistochemically stained CNB sections, and ultrasound features were classified according to K-TIRADS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed in the overall cohort. Logistic regression analyses were restricted to 57 category IV nodules. Results: In the overall cohort, the Ki-67 labeling index showed excellent diagnostic performance for predicting malignancy, with an area under the curve of 0.924. The optimal cutoff was 1.73%, with 88.7% sensitivity and 83.1% specificity. In category IV nodules, K-TIRADS category and Ki-67 labeling index were independently associated with malignancy. The odds ratios were 6.02 (95% CI, 1.53–23.74) for each one-category increase in K-TIRADS and 4.44 (95% CI, 1.69–11.70) for each percentage-point increase in Ki-67. In the Ki-67-only model, a Ki-67 index of 5% corresponded to a predicted malignancy probability of 98.1%. Conclusions: Digital Ki-67 quantification, integrated with K-TIRADS, may serve as a practical adjunct for malignancy risk stratification in thyroid CNB specimens, particularly for category IV nodules. Further external validation is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: