Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective observational study assessing temperature tracking ability in cardiac surgery patients, suggesting enhanced monitoring methods.
Background Monitoring both nasopharyngeal temperature (T NP ) and arterial blood temperature at the CPB arterial outlet is routinely used in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We examined the agreement and temperature tracking ability of zero-heat-flux skin temperature (T ZHF ) compared with T NP in cardiac surgery. Methods Of 40 patients scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery with CPB, paired T ZHF and T NP measurements were recorded for 33 patients, yielding 8610 measurements across pre-CPB, CPB-cooling, CPB-maintenance, CPB-rewarming, and post-CPB. Results In the final, trimmed dataset, T ZHF and T NP at 30 min after CPB weaning, the primary endpoint, showed similar mean values (35.57 ± 0.69 °C vs. 35.69 ± 0.61 °C; P = 0.181), with a mean difference of –0.12 °C (95% Confidence Interval: –0.29 to 0.06). Bland–Altman analysis showed a small mean bias between T ZHF and T NP across all intraoperative phases, ranging from − 0.55 to 0.28 °C. However, the limits of agreement (LOA) exceeded the clinically acceptable ± 0.5 °C during CPB-cooling and CPB-rewarming. Mixed-effects modeling showed considerable between-patient variability in the difference between T ZHF and T NP measurements during periods of rapid temperature change. Consistent with the Bland–Altman results, correlation coefficients between T ZHF and T NP measurements remained high (ranging from 0.798 to 0.958), and their intraclass correlation coefficients were high (ranging from 0.82 to 0.99) across all intraoperative phases. Conclusions Our results indicate that T ZHF tracked T NP trends, but its large LOA limits its accuracy and reliability. Simultaneous blood temperature monitoring would enhance T ZHF ’s effectiveness, as is currently done in cardiac surgery, where both blood temperature and T NP are monitored. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04160845.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: