Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized predictive modeling develops potent inhibitors for Factor Xa, suggesting effective design methods.
Factor Xa (FXa) remains an important target in the development of anticoagulant and antithrombotic agents. In this study, twenty isosteviol-derived oxime ether analogs previously reported as FXa inhibitors were used to develop a predictive QSAR model. The compounds were geometry-optimized at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level, and Dragon molecular descriptors were calculated from the optimized structures. After descriptor filtering, Random Forest-based supervised preselection and correlation-based pruning were applied. Several models of increasing complexity were evaluated, including multiple linear regression, additive MARSplines, and constrained second-order MARSplines models. The final model employed four active basis functions involving R6p+, C-025, ATSC7e, and Mor31p and demonstrated excellent calibration and cross-validated predictive ability (R2 = 0.929 and Q2_LOO = 0.865). Based on this model, twenty new isosteviol-derived analogs were designed and their activities were predicted after DFT optimization and descriptor calculation. Eight representative compounds were subsequently subjected to molecular docking against human factor Xa (PDB ID: 2P16), molecular dynamics simulations, MM/GBSA binding free energy calculations, and preliminary SwissADME/pkCSM profiling. Docking protocol validation yielded a redocking RMSD of 0.953 Å. Although ISV-M20 was the highest-ranked compound according to the QSAR model, subsequent receptor-based analyses identified ISV-M19, ISV-M04, and ISV-M06 as the derivatives with the most favorable combination of structural stability, persistent protein–ligand interactions, and binding free energies. The ADMET/toxicity screen further refined this prioritization: ISV-M19, ISV-M04, and ISV-M06 showed the most favorable preliminary toxicity balance among the prioritized derivatives, whereas ISV-M20 displayed additional developability liabilities, including very high lipophilicity, poor predicted solubility, P-gp substrate status, and a predicted hERG II alert. Overall, the results demonstrate that integrating interpretable QSAR modeling with receptor-based simulations and early ADMET/toxicity filtering provides a more balanced strategy for the rational design and prioritization of novel isosteviol-derived FXa inhibitors than any single computational approach alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: