Compares ethical outcomes of open-source AI and proprietary systems in theological classrooms, suggesting significant benefits for transparency and inclusivity.
This study investigates how openness in AI design influences theological learning in religious education (RE). Drawing on Zizioulas's theology of personhood and Floridi's information ethics and aligned with the Greek upper‐secondary RE curriculum, an open‐source multilingual model (Apertus) is compared with a proprietary system (GPT‐5). Fifty curriculum‐based prompts generated paired 200‐word responses, evaluated by three theologian‐educators on ethical transparency, inclusivity, doctrinal responsibility, and stylistic fluency. Evaluations were conducted by three theologian‐educators with professional experience in university‐level religious studies and ethics, ensuring alignment with contemporary higher‐education discourse. Apertus scored significantly higher in the first three dimensions (Cohen's d = 1.28–3.46), with strong inter‐rater agreement ( κ = 0.85). Qualitative findings confirmed that Apertus grounded dignity in the image of God ( imago Dei ), treated interfaith dialogue as a theological vocation, and linked digital ethics to stewardship with traceable sources, while GPT‐5 produced fluent but secularized answers. It is concluded that openness and configurability determine the ethical and theological reliability of artificial intelligence in RE, advancing dialogue, freedom of belief, and human dignity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christos Papakostas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: