Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bibliometric analysis reveals limited literature on breastfeeding in emergencies, indicating a need for evidence-based strategies.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze the scientific literature on breastfeeding during natural hazards, using a bibliometric approach, within the IYCF-E framework. STUDY METHOD: Data were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection in December 2024. The search was limited to English-language articles and included keywords such as "natural hazards," "earthquake," "flood," "hurricane," and "breastfeeding." Of the 148 identified articles, 27 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Biblioshiny interface in R (Version 4.2.1) and RStudio, with visualizations generated using VOSviewer. FINDINGS: published the highest number of articles. Frequently used keywords included "breastfeeding," "earthquake," "emergency," and "disasters." Thematic analysis indicated that infant health, emergencies, and breastfeeding were central themes, whereas maternal mental health, including stress and depression, emerged as growing areas of interest. However, limited attention was given to the life-saving role of breastfeeding and the risks associated with BMS within an IYCF-E framework. CONCLUSION: The scientific literature on breastfeeding in emergency contexts remains limited. Existing studies are predominantly descriptive and largely focused on earthquake settings. Future research should adopt an IYCF-E perspective, explicitly recognize breastfeeding as a life-saving intervention, and develop evidence-based strategies to protect, promote, and support breastfeeding while preventing inappropriate use of BMS in emergency preparedness and response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karataş et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: