Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review examines supportive care, prevention, and emerging therapies for acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease, highlighting potential future improvements.
INTRODUCTION: Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause of death and a major cause of hospitalization in sickle cell disease (SCD). Despite advances in care, ACS remains a life-threatening complication with no FDA-approved targeted therapy for established disease. This review examines the current evidence base for supportive care, preventive strategies, and emerging therapies. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, clinical trial registries, and major hematology conferences through December 2025. This review synthesizes data on supportive measures (fluid management, analgesia, antibiotics, oxygen/respiratory support, and transfusion), preventive interventions (incentive spirometry and nocturnal bilevel positive airway pressure), disease-modifying therapies (hydroxyurea, L-glutamine), investigational agents (therapeutic anticoagulation, inhaled nitric oxide, and pyruvate kinase activators), and recently approved gene therapies (exagamglogene autotemcel, lovotibeglogene autotemcel). Pathophysiology, biomarkers, and barriers to implementation in resource-limited settings are also addressed. EXPERT OPINION: Supportive care has reduced ACS mortality but remains reactive and non-curative. Hydroxyurea remains first-line prevention, while L-glutamine offers a complementary option. Gene therapies represent a paradigm shift toward durable or potentially curative prevention of ACS. With expanding access to these therapies, ACS may become a rare complication of SCD, although significant barriers related to cost, infrastructure, and global equity must be overcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rice et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: