Key result
Better lipid management practices linked to ~21% higher odds of LDL-C target attainment in CHD.
Why the study?
LDL-C target attainment remains suboptimal in patients with CHD, and evidence regarding the association of patient knowledge, attitudes, and practices with LDL-C control is limited in Chinese populations.
Cross-Sectional (n=520)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 1.213 (95% CI 1.095–1.352)
p-value: p=<0.001
In Chinese patients with coronary heart disease, positive attitudes and practices regarding lipid management were independently associated with achieving stringent LDL-C targets, whereas knowledge alone was not.
Attitudes and practices linked to LDL-C attainment in CHD; hypothesis-generating for KAP interventions, prospective trials needed.
Background Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target attainment remains suboptimal in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Patients’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding lipid management may be associated with LDL-C control; however, evidence from Chinese populations remains limited. Methods This multicenter cross-sectional study included 520 patients with CHD from two hospitals in China. Lipid management-related KAP were assessed using a questionnaire developed specifically for this study. LDL-C target attainment was the outcome. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed. Results Overall, 22.5% of participants (117/520) achieved the LDL-C target. After adjustment for clinical covariates, attitude (OR = 1.136, 95% CI 1.076–1.203; P < 0.001) and practice (OR = 1.213, 95% CI 1.095–1.352; P < 0.001) remained significantly associated with LDL-C target attainment, whereas knowledge did not (OR = 1.013, 95% CI 0.878–1.172; P = 0.855). Adding KAP variables to the clinical model showed incremental within-sample discriminatory value for LDL-C target attainment, with the area under the curve increasing from 0.772 to 0.817 ( P = 0.005). Conclusions Among Chinese patients with CHD, higher lipid management-related attitude and practice scores were significantly associated with LDL-C target attainment, whereas knowledge scores were not. KAP information showed incremental within-sample discriminatory value beyond the available clinical factors. Given the cross-sectional design, self-developed questionnaire, and lack of detailed lipid-lowering treatment information, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory associations rather than evidence of causal or clinically actionable determinants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease (n=520). Lipid management-related practice score vs. Lower practice score was evaluated on LDL-C target attainment (<1.4 mmol/L) (OR 1.213, 95% CI 1.095-1.352, p=<0.001). Higher lipid management-related practice (OR 1.213) and attitude (OR 1.136) scores were significantly associated with LDL-C target attainment in Chinese patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: