Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates tetramethylsilane coordination in barium, calcium, and strontium complexes, suggesting weak bonding interactions.
The bulky xanthene-bridged diamido-barium complex, [( Et NON TCHP )Ba(η 6 -toluene)] 1-Ba ( Et NON TCHP = 4,5-bis{(TCHP)N}-2,7-diethyl-9,9-dimethyl-xanthene, TCHP = 2,4,6-tricyclohexylphenyl), has been prepared and exists as a weakly associated polymer in the solid-state. While this is unreactive toward tetramethylsilane (TMS), its lighter analogues [( Et NON TCHP )M(η 6 -toluene)] 1-M (M = Ca and Sr) coordinate to TMS giving the 1:1 complexes [( Et NON TCHP )M(η 6 -toluene)(κ 2 - H, H -TMS)] 2-M (M = Ca or Sr). In the solid-state, the TMS ligands in these species appear to ligate the metal centers in a κ 2 - H, H -mode. NMR spectroscopic studies imply that the TMS ligands of 2-M dissociate from the metal center, even in noncoordinating solvents. A theoretical analysis of the strength and nature of the metal-TMS bonding in 2-M has been carried out. First, precursor complexes 1-M were computed to be strong Lewis acids, which coordinate the poorly nucleophilic TMS ligand, to give 2-M . DFT analyses revealed the strength of bonding between TMS and the 1-M fragments to be weak (Δ G 298 K ° = −6.6 and −6.9 kcal mol –1 for 2-Ca and 2-Sr, respectively). ETS-NOCV and NBO analyses of the bonding in 2-Ca indicated that, while electrostatic interactions between the TMS and 1-Ca units dominate (ca. 68%), both dispersion (ca. 20%) and orbital (ca. 12%) interactions make significant contributions to the total attractive energy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parr et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: