Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To meet the growing demand for multifunctional protective textiles, flame-retardant/antistatic core-spun composite yarns were developed by combining roving core-spinning with filament wrapping. Nine yarn samples were systematically prepared by varying core twist (20, 25, 30 twists per meter (T/m)) and feeding spacing (1, 3, 5 mm), and their mechanical and functional properties were comprehensively evaluated. Optimal overall performance was achieved at a core twist of 25 T/m and a feeding spacing of 3 mm. Compared to the control (20 T/m core twist), the breaking tenacity of the optimal sample increased by 30.65%, and the coefficient of variation (CV) of yarn evenness decreased by 17.3%. Increasing feeding spacing from 1 to 3 mm improved breaking tenacity by 7.88%, reduced yarn evenness CV by 19.45%, and decreased short and long hairiness counts by 35.38% and 40.79%, respectively. All samples demonstrated excellent flame retardancy, while antistatic performance exhibited a nonlinear trend, peaking at a 3 mm feeding spacing. A backpropagation (BP) neural network model was established for further process optimization, predicting a global optimal combination of 26 T/m core twist and 2.9 mm feeding spacing. The response surface methodology subsequently validated the BP model, confirming the accuracy of these predicted parameters. Experimental validation using the BP-predicted parameters confirmed positive optimization across all performance indicators, fully verifying the model’s accuracy and reliability. This study offers a practical foundation for developing high-performance flame-retardant and antistatic composite yarns and advancing protective textile technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: