Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines how nanoparticle structure impacts proton-coupled electron transfer in metal oxides, indicating significant implications for catalysis.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Proton-coupled electron transfers (PCETs) to metal oxides are key reactions for sustainable catalytic and energy storage processes. The factors that control PCET reactions on metal oxides are, however, not well understood, with the effect of particle morphology/surface faceting on the thermodynamics and kinetics of PCET being essentially untested. We measured the thermodynamics and kinetics of PCET from CpCr(CO) 3 H to five V 2 O 5 samples of varying morphologies/surface faceting. Their nanostructures were assessed by Rietveld refinement accounting for preferred crystallite orientation, giving a semiquantitative measurement of surface faceting. PCET to V 2 O 5 occurs via proton insertion-coupled electron transfer (PICET), where H· diffuses into the bulk of the particle. The thermodynamics of PICET are controlled by particle structure, with nonequilibrium morphologies requiring structural rearrangement during PICET. The kinetics of PICET are controlled by the rate of H· diffusion into the bulk, with diffusion along the interconnected V 2 O 5 layers being 10x faster than between the layers. Samples with hindered H· diffusion also show low activity in the oxidation of methanol, demonstrating that diffusion of H· into the bulk occurs during catalysis. This work demonstrates that particle morphology is critical for PCET reactions to anisotropic metal oxides and must be considered when examining their reactivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bunjaku et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: