Establishes four conditions for optimal modularization based on change propagation principles.
The companion papers [1] and [2] established that cohesion is a 2π-tuple parameterized by π partitioning rules, and instantiated it with one concrete principle β change-driver-assignment identity (Ξ(π1) = Ξ(π2)) β without arguing that driver-equivalence is the right principle. This paper pins the free parameter. Under the change-driver hypothesis and the objective of minimizing change propagation, four conditions are necessary and structurally exhaustive:1. Admissibility β every element has at least one driver.2. Element Form β every element is pure or irreducibly composite.3. Separation β different-driver elements belong in different modules.4. Unification β same-driver elements belong in the same module. The first two constrain the element set; the last two constrain the partition.The first three hold strictly under any faithful propagation measure (satisfying structural monotonicity properties S1βS4); Separation holds strictly under the contamination premise. Together they select the unique partition πΈβ/ βΌΞ . When π = 1, Separation and Unification are exactly the purity and completeness axes of π»causal; the four conditions reduce to the two-axis criterion that π»causal measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yannick Loth (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: