Demonstrates improved thermal comfort and energy efficiency in shared classrooms, suggesting effective HVAC management.
Improving HVAC energy efficiency while maintaining collective thermal comfort remains challenging in multi-occupant shared indoor environments, where occupants differ in thermal sensation, activity level, clothing condition, and spatial distribution. This study develops and field-validates an integrated edge-cloud IoT framework that connects non-invasive occupant-state sensing, INT8 edge thermal-sensation inference, and group-comfort-oriented HVAC setpoint optimization for classroom-based shared spaces. The proposed system integrates localized temperature–humidity sensing, vision-derived occupancy, posture, and clothing estimation, cloud-based thermal sensation model training, and edge-deployed real-time control on a HUB 8735 ULTRA device. A 4-day model-training data collection campaign with structured questionnaires was first conducted to obtain occupants’ Thermal Sensation Votes (TSVs) as ground-truth labels. The trained model was compressed from Float32 to INT8 through post-training quantization and deployed on the edge device for real-time inference. Predicted individual TSV values were then transformed into a PPD-inspired TSV-derived dissatisfaction index and used to determine the HVAC setpoint through rolling-horizon group comfort optimization. A separate eight-school-day single-blind daily-block A/B field validation was conducted, with four validation days assigned to the proposed smart control strategy and four days assigned to a fixed 25 °C baseline. The validation dataset included 2194 valid TSV questionnaire responses, which were aggregated into 116 valid 30 min classroom sessions for statistical comparison. The proposed control achieved a session-level mean TSV of −0.13, compared with −0.66 under the baseline, with Welch’s t(100) = 11.2, p < 0.001 and Cohen’s d = 2.11. Daily HVAC energy use decreased from 2.61 to 2.32 kWh/day, corresponding to a cumulative reduction of 1.16 kWh, or 11.1%, over the validation period. These results support the short-term feasibility of the proposed classroom-level human-centric HVAC control framework. However, because the validation was limited to a short-term classroom setting without full weather/load normalization, longer multi-season and multi-room studies are required to further evaluate generalizability and long-term energy performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: