Cross-sectional study analyzes factors influencing molecular diagnosis in inherited retinal disease patients, suggesting improved genetic testing strategies.
Purpose To determine whether the clinical characteristics of IRD patients are associated with the positive molecular diagnosis.Methods This multi-center cross-sectional study analyzed 492 IRD patients in Taiwan enrolled between January 2018 and May 2022. Patients with clinical IRD suspicion aged between 0 and 96 years with no previous genetic diagnosis were enrolled.Results Among the 492 patients recruited, 274 (55.7%) received a molecular diagnosis. The mean age at first visit was 49.5 years, and 245 patients (49.8%) were male. Positive genetic results were observed in 67 of 72 patients (93.1%) with onset age < 10 years, compared with 18 of 28 (64.3%) in those with onset age ≥ 50 years. Positive results were also more common in patients with a positive IRD family history, 136 of 162 (84.0%), compared with those without a family history, 138 of 179 (77.1%). In addition, patients with a previous genetic diagnosis in one family member had a higher diagnostic yield. In univariate analysis, male sex (OR 1.83; p < .01), age of onset 0–9 years (OR 3.00; p < .01), a positive IRD family history (OR 4.18; p < .05), and a previous genetic diagnosis in one family member (OR 4.24; p < .001) were associated with higher odds of a positive result. For worse-seeing-eye BCVA, diagnostic yield ranged from 68.6% in patients with normal vision to 87.5% in those with moderate visual impairment and 85.1% in those with no light perception. In the multivariate model, only worse-seeing-eye logMAR BCVA > 2.0 remained independently associated with positive testing (OR 4.80; p < .001). No negative predictors of panel-based molecular diagnosis were identified.Conclusion We discovered key patient-level demographic and clinical factors associated with increased odds of obtaining a molecular diagnosis. This study supports further evaluations of clinical characteristics that can improve the cost-benefit of panel-based genetic testing for IRD, paving the way for efficient genetic diagnostics and identifying high-risk panel-undiagnosable patients to pursue more advanced sequencing platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: