Retrospective cohort evaluated panel-based genetic testing yield in inherited retinal diseases, suggesting improvement methods.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of panel-based genetic testing for inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) and identify barriers to molecular resolution. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 404 patients with clinically confirmed IRDs who were evaluated at the Adult Inherited Retinal Dystrophy Service, Ontario, Canada (October 2021-September 2024). METHODS: Patients underwent targeted massive parallel sequencing panel testing. Diagnostic yield was calculated, and unresolved cases were reviewed. Associations between yield, phenotype, ethnicity, and sex were assessed using χ² analysis. RESULTS: Of 685 referrals, 570 had confirmed IRDs. After we excluded 140 pending results and 26 patients who declined testing, 404 patients were analyzed. At referral, 94 patients (23.2%) had a previous molecular diagnosis, and 138 (34.0%) were diagnosed through clinic-initiated testing, giving an overall yield of 57.4%. Yield varied significantly by phenotype (χ², P = 1.4 × 10⁻⁶), from 94.4% in vitelliform macular dystrophies to 25.0% in vitreoretinopathies, with no sex association (P = 1.0). Disease-causing variants were identified in 83 IRD-associated genes, most frequently ABCA4, USH2A, and BEST1. Of 172 unresolved cases, 62 (15.3%) had negative panels, and 110 (27.2%) were inconclusive, including 30 with unphased pathogenic variants in recessive genes and 10 with high-suspicion variants of uncertain significance. Key barriers included limited family availability for phasing, restricted access to functional assays, and lack of public coverage for whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: Massive parallel sequencing-based panel testing achieved a 57% diagnostic yield in this IRD population. Success was strongly phenotype-dependent with substantial heterogeneity. Whole-exome sequencing, whole-genome sequencing, family segregation, and functional genomics could improve diagnostic outcomes and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: