Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Technical disclosure describes architecture to govern decisions using versioned regimes, emphasizing verifiable outcomes.
This technical disclosure describes an infrastructure architecture for governing consequential decisions through declared regimes: versioned, executable specification objects that define the schema, policy, proof obligations, authority requirements, and lifecycle governing a class of decisions. The disclosure presents a decision runtime that evaluates candidates under declared regimes, emits independently verifiable decision artifacts, and supports replay without reliance on the originating runtime. It further describes regime registries, lifecycle management, version migration, automated conformance certification, LLM-assisted regime authoring, dependency-aware retraction graphs, federated verification topologies, and actuarial feedback systems operating over decision-artifact streams. Alternative deployment, custody, licensing, settlement, and governance embodiments are included. The document is published as a technical disclosure establishing prior art for the disclosed systems and methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Devin Bostick (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: