Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates safety and effectiveness of endoscopic technique for spinal tumors, suggesting promising outcomes.
There has been a tremendous focus on endoscopic spine surgery in the past two decades. The aims and objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of full-endoscopic mono-portal excision of spinal tumors, that is, intradural extramedullary (IDEM). We included five cases (n = 5) from different age groups in this study. IDEM tumors were at different levels, including the D12–L1 junctional area. All underwent excision through the full-endoscopic mono-portal approach. Few instruments were customized (endo-dural knife, knot-pusher), and tumors were mobilized, separated, and excised. Endo-suturing was performed with Prolene 6–0 1/2 circle sutures. All the patients were observed for wound leak, motor or sensory deficit, and functional outcomes in the postoperative period. All had no/no added deficit postoperatively, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)/American Spine Injury Association (ASIA) scores improved in the postoperative period. There was no cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak or pseudomeningocele formation during hospital stay or in follow-ups. The full-endoscopic mono-portal excision of IDEM spine tumors appears to be a feasible technique, with the advantages of a small skin incision, less tissue damage, and early ambulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: