Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Co-design methodology tailors a cognitive-behavioral intervention for burnout, suggesting a need for improved approaches.
Burnout persists as an unresolved issue, as the effectiveness of interventions remains a subject of ongoing debate. To address the need for more suitable intervention approaches, this study describes a methodology for adapting the Unified Protocol (UP), an evidence-based cognitive-behavioral intervention, for group-based use to treat burnout. To ensure that the intervention reflected lived experiences, we employed a co-design methodology based on the Experience-Based Co-Design Framework. The sample comprised participants currently experiencing burnout or who had experienced it within the past year ( n = 4) and a panel of experts ( n = 4) actively working with individuals experiencing burnout. The co-design process included interviews, four feedback sessions, seven iterative co-design sessions, and an expert evaluation. Insights from interviews and feedback sessions informed the adaptation of the intervention. Key modifications included introducing a values-based module, merging two modules into a single session, and adding a new component on cognitive functioning, along with content and technique adjustments tailored to the realities of burnout. The resulting protocol is referred to as the Unified Protocol for Burnout (UP-B), a group-based adaptation of the UP designed for therapeutic use. Future research should examine the feasibility, efficacy, and underlying mechanisms of the intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gândilă et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: