Randomized trial evaluates nalmefene formulations for rapid opioid reversal in healthy individuals, suggesting improved outcomes.
Aim Time to onset of reversal is critical when treating opioid‐induced respiratory depression and hypoxia. This study aimed to develop a formulation of the opioid antagonist nalmefene with an increased absorption rate and reduced time to onset of reversal following intramuscular administration. Methods Several absorption enhancers were screened in rats, followed by confirmatory studies in dogs. Subsequently, nalmefene formulations with a range of MgCl 2 concentrations were evaluated in a two‐part translational clinical study in healthy participants. In Part 1 ( N = 17), pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed following intramuscular injections of nalmefene formulated with MgCl 2 (0.47%–4.7%) or NaCl (0.9%). In Part 2 ( N = 6), participants received intravenous fentanyl to produce opioid‐induced respiratory depression. They were then dosed with intramuscular nalmefene formulated with 0.94% MgCl 2 , intranasal naloxone or placebo (intramuscular saline) in a randomized six‐period crossover sequence with each treatment administered on two separate occasions. Minute ventilation, oxygen saturation and carbon dioxide were monitored continuously, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were evaluated. Results Pharmacokinetic profiles from animals indicated that MgCl 2 within a range of concentrations enhanced the nalmefene absorption rate. In the clinical studies, a nalmefene 1.5 mg formulation containing 0.94% MgCl 2 demonstrated more rapid absorption compared with a formulation containing 0.9% NaCl and also produced faster, more robust reversal of opioid‐induced respiratory depression compared with intranasal naloxone. Conclusion These preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that a nalmefene formulation containing magnesium chloride produced more rapid nalmefene absorption after intramuscular injection, which is advantageous for the treatment of opioid overdose in settings where life support is not immediately available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cipriano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: