Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study evaluated bioremediation techniques' effects on soil health in oil-contaminated areas, indicating optimal strategies for rehabilitation.
Oil contamination from private refineries in the Kwashe industrial area, Iraqi Kurdistan, poses a severe threat to soil health. This study evaluated the efficacy of different bioremediation techniques—biostimulation via aeration/watering, and bio-composting using sheep manure, chicken manure, and compost—on soil contaminated with crude oil and its derivatives. The dynamics of key soil health parameters (Nitrogen, Organic Carbon, Organic Matter, and C/N ratio) were monitored over 60 days and compared to intrinsic (natural) bioremediation and a non-polluted control. Results showed that bio-composting significantly enhanced bioremediation efficiency compared to other methods. The compost amendment was most effective in conserving nitrogen (0.801–0.301%) and maintaining stable organic carbon (6.93–4.22%) and C/N ratio (13.41–22.60), indicating a balanced and sustained microbial degradation process. Chicken manure initially provided high nitrogen and organic matter but led to rapid nutrient loss and a high C/N ratio by day 60, suggesting less stable decomposition. Biostimulation (aeration/watering) and intrinsic bioremediation were the least effective, with the latter showing a critically high C/N ratio (> 100), indicating severe nitrogen limitation. The study concludes that bio-composting, particularly with compost, is the most effective strategy for rehabilitating oil-contaminated soils in the region, as it optimizes nutrient cycling, enhances microbial activity, and leads to a more stable and fertile soil condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: