Key result
Thoracoscopic LAA exclusion linked to zero ischemic strokes versus a predicted ~4.8 per 100 patient-years.
Why the study?
Oral anticoagulation reduces stroke risk in AF but is limited by complication risk and non-compliance, prompting evaluation of standalone thoracoscopic LAAE as an alternative.
Does standalone thoracoscopic left atrial appendage exclusion safely prevent ischemic strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications to oral anticoagulation?
Cohort (n=175)
Yes
Does standalone thoracoscopic left atrial appendage exclusion safely prevent ischemic strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications to oral anticoagulation?
Standalone thoracoscopic epicardial left atrial appendage exclusion is a feasible and safe alternative to oral anticoagulation that appears to effectively eliminate ischemic stroke risk in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation.
May support stroke prevention in anticoagulation-ineligible AF; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: Most strokes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) result from left atrial appendage thrombi. Oral anticoagulation can reduce stroke risk but is limited by complication risk and non-compliance. Left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) is a new surgical option to reduce stroke risk in AF. The study objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of standalone thoracoscopic LAAE in high stroke risk AF patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentre study of high stroke risk AF patients who had oral anticoagulation contraindications and were not candidates for ablation nor other cardiac surgery. Standalone thoracoscopic LAAE was performed using 3 unilateral ports access and epicardial clip. Periprocedural adverse events, long-term observational clinical outcomes and stroke rate were evaluated. RESULTS: Procedural success was 99.4% (174/175 patients). Pleural effusion occurred in 4 (2.3%) patients; other periprocedural complications were <1% each. One perioperative haemorrhagic stroke occurred (0.6%). No phrenic nerve palsy or cardiac tamponade occurred. Predicted annual ischaemic stroke rate of 4.8/100 patient-years (based on median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4.0) was significantly higher than stroke risk observed in follow-up after LAAE. No ischaemic strokes occurred (median follow-up: 12.5 months), resulting in observed rate of 0 (95% CI 0-2.0)/100 patient-years (P < 0.001 versus predicted). Six all-cause (non-device-related) deaths occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Study proved that a new surgical option, standalone thoracoscopic LAAE, is feasible and safe. With this method, long-term stroke rate may be reduced compared to predicted for high-risk AF population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cartledge et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation with high stroke risk and oral anticoagulation contraindications (n=175). Standalone thoracoscopic left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) vs. Predicted stroke rate (based on CHA2DS2-VASc score) was evaluated on Ischemic stroke rate per 100 patient-years (Observed rate 0 vs predicted 4.8 per 100 patient-years, 95% CI 0-2.0, p=<0.001). Standalone thoracoscopic left atrial appendage exclusion resulted in an observed ischemic stroke rate of 0 per 100 patient-years compared to a predicted rate of 4.8 per 100 patient-years (P < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: