Key result
Prolonged JTcF interval is linked to ~2.6-fold higher odds of an ADHD diagnosis in youth.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether repolarization measures differ between children and adolescents with ADHD and normal subjects, and whether the JTc interval strengthens differentiation compared to QTc.
Do repolarization measures (QTc and JTc intervals) differ between children and adolescents with ADHD and normal controls?
Case-Control (n=2,366)
No
Do repolarization measures (QTc and JTc intervals) differ between children and adolescents with ADHD and normal controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: Our research aims were to determine if repolarization measures (QTcF, QTcB, JTcF, and JTcB) in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) children and adolescents differ from normal subjects and determine if the JTc interval duration, as a purer repolarization measure than QTc, strengthens the differentiation between ADHD and normal children and adolescents. Methods: This study included 418 subjects aged 5–18 years who were diagnosed with ADHD, and 1948 subjects in a historical normal control group. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the independent groups on normal continuous outcomes. Means and standard deviations (SDs) were reported and interpreted for the ANOVA. Logistic regression analysis was performed to test the ability of four variables (QTcB, QTcF, JTcB, and JTcF) to predict an ADHD diagnosis, with age and gender as independent covariates. The log odds with standard errors for each variable were reported and interpreted for the logistic models. Results: In the nominal logistic regressions with JTcF ≥322 or JTcB ≥335 (values 1 SD above the mean of the control group), age and sex were significant contributors to the models that showed that subjects with a JTcF ≥322 ms had a statistically and significantly higher probability to be diagnosed with ADHD in comparison with normal control subjects (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.02–3.33, p < 0.0001). Similarly, those subjects with a JTcB ≥335 ms were 2.7 times more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD than normal control subjects (OR: 2.7, 95% CI 2.1–3.45, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: JTc provided a clearer separation of the groups than QTc. JTcB and JTcF 1 SD above the control group means are strong predictors of ADHD diagnosis and remain so even when strong demographic predictors of longer QTc (age and sex) are included in the regression models. Consideration should be given to recording a pretreatment electrocardiogram in all children and adolescents with ADHD, and to measuring and monitoring JTc in patients with ADHD, especially when considering the addition of QT prolonging drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isart et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (n=2,366). Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) vs. Normal control subjects was evaluated on Prolonged JTcF interval (≥322 ms) (OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.02-3.33, p=<0.0001). Children and adolescents with a prolonged JTcF interval (≥322 ms) had significantly higher odds of an ADHD diagnosis compared to normal control subjects (OR 2.6).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: