Key result
A 3-biomarker panel of NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 measured at admission and discharge improved the C-index to 0.782 for predicting 12-month mortality in acute heart failure compared to clinical models alone.
Why the study?
Most multi-biomarker strategies in acute heart failure have only assessed biomarkers at a single time point.
Does a 3-biomarker panel (NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, GDF-15) measured at admission and discharge improve 12-month mortality risk prediction compared to clinical models in patients with acute heart failure?
Observational (n=830)
Yes
Does a 3-biomarker panel (NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, GDF-15) measured at admission and discharge improve 12-month mortality risk prediction compared to clinical models in patients with acute heart failure?
Effect estimate: C-index 0.782 (95% CI 0.747-0.817)
p-value: p=<0.001
A 3-biomarker panel including NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 measured at admission and discharge significantly improves 12-month mortality risk prediction in acute heart failure compared to standard clinical scores.
May refine acute HF mortality risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Introduction and Objectives: Most multi-biomarker strategies in acute heart failure (HF) have only measured biomarkers in a single-point time. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic yielding of NT-proBNP, hsTnT, Cys-C, hs-CRP, GDF15, and GAL-3 in HF patients both at admission and discharge. Methods: We included 830 patients enrolled consecutively in a prospective multicenter registry. Primary outcome was 12-month mortality. The gain in the C-index, calibration, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was calculated after adding each individual biomarker value or their combination on top of the best clinical model developed in this study (C-index 0.752, 0.715–0.789) and also on top of 4 currently used scores (MAGGIC, GWTG-HF, Redin-SCORE, BCN-bioHF). Results: After 12-month, death occurred in 154 (18.5%) cases. On top of the best clinical model, the addition of NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 above the respective cutoff point at admission and discharge and their delta during compensation improved the C-index to 0.782 (0.747–0.817), IDI by 5% ( p < 0.001), and NRI by 57% ( p < 0.001) for 12-month mortality. A 4-risk grading categories for 12-month mortality (11.7, 19.2, 26.7, and 39.4%, respectively; p < 0.001) were obtained using combination of these biomarkers. Conclusion: A model including NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 measured at admission and discharge afforded a mortality risk prediction greater than our clinical model and also better than the most currently used scores. In addition, this 3-biomarker panel defined 4-risk categories for 12-month mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Álvarez‐García et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute Heart Failure (n=830). Elevated NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 at admission and discharge vs. Clinical model alone was evaluated on 12-month all-cause mortality (C-index 0.782, 95% CI 0.747-0.817, p=<0.001). A 3-biomarker panel of NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 measured at admission and discharge improved the C-index to 0.782 for predicting 12-month mortality in acute heart failure compared to clinical models alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: