Key result
APTT reagents show wide variability in heparin sensitivity, requiring reagent-specific rather than uniform therapeutic ranges.
Observational
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assessment reveals differences in heparin sensitivity of APTT reagents, highlighting implications for monitoring.
AIM: To assess the sensitivity of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagents for monitoring heparin dosage using data from the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for blood coagulation. METHODS: Data were reviewed from four surveys using samples prepared by addition of heparin to normal plasma in vitro and from two surveys in which samples were prepared using plasma from patients receiving heparin therapy (ex vivo samples). RESULTS: For both in vitro and ex vivo samples, notable differences between APTT reagents with respect to heparin sensitivity were noted. This indicates that a uniform therapeutic range of 1.5-2.5 calculated by the APTT ratio may not be appropriate for all reagents. Reagent sensitivity in ex vivo samples was substantially different to that in in vitro samples. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large series of laboratories clearly indicate that reagent specific therapeutic ranges may be necessary, and that samples prepared by the addition of heparin to normal plasma in vitro can be misleading and should not be used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitchen et al. (1996) conducted an observational in Heparin dosage monitoring. Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagents was evaluated on Sensitivity of APTT reagents to heparin. Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagents showed wide variability in heparin sensitivity, indicating that reagent-specific therapeutic ranges are necessary rather than a uniform ratio.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: