Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This explanatory mixed-method sequential study examined the artificial intelligence (AI) self-efficacy in English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers using an intervention-based, two-week program centered around Diffit, an AI-driven, lesson planning and instructional differentiation tool. 35 in-service EFL teachers (80% female, M age = 38.7 years, teaching experience 2-25 years) were enrolled in the study. The AI Self-efficacy Scale (AISES) was used to gather quantitative data in a one-group pretest-posttest study, and the qualitative data were in the form of written reflections of teachers using inductive thematic coding. The results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that the outcome of AI self-efficacy between pretest and posttest was statistically different. The qualitative analysis revealed seven major themes that explained this enhancement: AI self-efficacy, efficiency and time-saving, differentiation and access, quality control and teacher judgment, barriers to implementation, student engagement, and ethics and data concerns. The research provides empirical support to AI self-efficacy as a specific variable in the study of educational technology and offers recommendations on how to approach the design of effective professional development that helps language educators to integrate AI tools in a way that is thoughtful and sustainable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferdi Çelik (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: