Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study assesses surgical outcomes in melanoma brain metastases patients receiving BRAF inhibitors, indicating varying clinical effects.
Background Melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) pose significant clinical challenges, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Treatment with the BRAF inhibitors has demonstrated long-term clinical benefit, although data regarding their efficacy in surgical MBM patients remain limited. Methods The study assesses the experience of 5 institutions with patients surgically treated for MBM. Clinical, treatment and performance status data were retrieved. Immunohistochemical, imaging findings, BRAF mutation status, target and systemic therapies were documented. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data were recorded. Results 95 patients met the inclusion criteria. The population was divided into two groups: 1. patients with BRAF-mutation (n = 32, BRAF-mut); 2. patients BRAF wild-type (n = 63, BRAF-wt). BRAF-mut showed a longer time between initial diagnosis and MBMs onset (83 vs. 65.3 months, p = 0.05). Hemorrhagic presentation was more common in the BRAF-mut group (31.3% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.01). BRAF-mut group exhibited a higher extracranial metastases incidence (68.8% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.025) with reduced Melan-A expression (34.4% vs. 50.7%, p = 0.05). Furthermore, BRAF-mut group experienced more frequently postoperative hemorrhage (12.5% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.07) with lower performance status, a higher recurrence rates (56.3% vs. 19%, p = 0.01), but longer PFS (15.03 vs. 5 months, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis confirmed the BRAF-mutations status as an independent factor for outcome. Conclusions Patients with melanoma receiving BRAF inhibitors exhibit improved OS and a decreased risk of developing MBMs. When MBMs manifest in BRAF-mutated patients, they typically present a different clinical course, with a significant prevalence of bleeding lesions at onset and marked deterioration in functional status after treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armocida et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: