Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating CAR-T versus engineered antibody efficacy post-BCMA exposure, indicating CAR-T's superiority.
Relapse following B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapies represents a critical challenge in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 studies (n = 1280) published between 2020 and 2025 to evaluate salvage CAR-T versus engineered antibody therapies post-BCMA exposure. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 60%. CAR-T therapy achieved significantly superior ORR compared to antibody-based approaches (77% vs 52%; p < 0.0001), with comparable complete response rates. While incidences of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were similar, grade ≥3 cytopenias were more frequent with CAR-T. Notably, GPRC5D-targeted CAR-T yielded higher ORRs than BCMA-targeted constructs (86% vs 66%; p = 0.0006). Furthermore, patients with prior exposure to BCMA bispecific antibodies exhibited lower response rates compared to those with prior CAR-T exposure (71% vs 86%; p = 0.0404). In addition, studies with a median interval of ≥10 months demonstrated significantly higher ORRs than those with <10 months (70% vs 50%; p = 0.0146). In conclusion, GPRC5D CAR-T demonstrates superior efficacy to engineered antibodies in the post-BCMA setting. These findings support prioritising earlier CAR-T use and underscore the importance of antigen selection in optimising treatment sequencing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: