Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows the relationship between kinetic inductance and superconductor width, indicating changes in stability.
Within the Ginzburg-Landau model, it is shown that for superconducting slabs and strips with a nonuniform current distribution across the width, the dependence of the kinetic inductance on current L k (I) is determined by the superconductor width w. For widths less than the critical width w c , L k diverges as the critical current I с (the depairing current I dep ) is approached, which coincides with the case of narrow superconducting slabs/strips with a uniform current distribution across the width. For w>w c , the kinetic inductance remains finite at I=I c . It is found that at w=w c , the instability mechanism of the superconducting state changes. For w>w c the transition to the resistive state at I=I с is associated with a modulational instability of the superconducting order parameter Ψ with a finite period, whose evolution over time leads to the entry of chains of vortices and antivortices from opposite edges of the superconductor. For w<w c , modulation of Ψ with a finite period occurs only at later stages of the instability development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bodyagin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: