Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Area under the concentration–time curve (AUC)-guided dosing for vancomycin requires the measurement of both peak and trough concentrations. Recently, a novel population pharmacokinetic model (Bayesian-based, free-web application PAT version 4.0) was developed. The aim of the present study was to verify whether this optimized pharmacokinetic model improved the predictive accuracy of AUC calculated using trough-only data compared to data obtained using trough and peak sampling on Day 2. We conducted a single-center, cohort study to evaluate the agreement of AUC calculated using trough-only data compared to peak–trough sampling on Day 2, and to compare results obtained with the Yasuhara (previous) and Oda (updated) pharmacokinetic models. The proportion of trough/peak–trough AUC24–48 ratios within a 5% difference was significantly higher with the Oda model than with the Yasuhara model (75 vs. 58.3%, p = 0.034). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that implementation of the Oda model was a significant factor associated with deviation of trough/peak–trough AUC24–48 within 5% (odds ratio 2.36, 95% confidence interval, 1.05–5.05, p = 0.027). The updated model offers enhanced predictive performance for AUC24–48 estimation using trough-only data. Further development of strategies to improve the predictive accuracy of AUC24–48 using trough-only data is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niwa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: