Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Secondary analysis explores death location impact on quality of dying experiences in older adults, suggesting policy implications.
Objective: The setting in which death occurs significantly shapes the quality of end-of-life experiences. We aimed to understand how dying in different settings (home, hospital, or hospice or palliative care units [PCU]) influences the quality of the dying experience. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of decedent interview data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, between January 2012 and March 2022. Proxies of deceased participants provided information on end-of-life experiences. We examined quality of death indicators across various locations and analyzed associations between end-of-life characteristics and the location of death. Results: Among the 1287 participants with completed decedent questionnaires, 17.2% (n = 222) of deceased participants died in hospice or PCU, 49% (n = 631) died in hospital and 22.7% (n = 292) died at home. Those who died at home died in their preferred place more frequently (89.4; standard difference (SD): 0.65), while individuals who died in PCU or hospice reported significantly lower levels of pain (81.5%; SD: 0.31). Dying in the Canadian province of Quebec (odds ratio [OR] 3.77; CI 2.28-6.37), dying of cancer (OR 6.79; CI 4.10-11.9), and having total physical impairment (OR 2.08; CI 1.41-3.08) increased the odds of dying in PCU or hospice. Conclusions: Dying in PCU or hospice may allow participants to die peacefully and have their pain under control, though dying at home aligns more closely with individual preferences, suggesting a potential compromise between quality and location of death. Regional health and social policies may influence where older individuals die.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aryal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: