The paper develops a non-counterfactual view on death's badness by analyzing desires, suggesting new insights into the nature of harm.
Epicurus’ argument against the badness of death has been a frequent subject of refutation. The most popular response has been by appeal to counterfactual theories of harm. However, this kind of response gives rise to numerous problems that do not seem to be easily solvable. I will argue for and develop a non-counterfactual desire-based account that does not give rise to these problems. In particular, I will argue that death is an atemporal harm that frustrates one’s voluntarily acquired categorical desires.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arthur Lee (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: