Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines indigenous rhythm as a civic practice in Hawai'i, suggesting its role in resisting ecological injustice.
This paper examines the concept of Indigenous rhythm as enacted within the Kū Kiaʻi Kahuku movement, a community-led response to ecological injustice in Hawaiʻi. We argue that rhythm – understood through Moana Oceanian tā-vā philosophy as the interplay of time (tā) and space (vā) – is not merely aesthetic but a civic and infrastructural practice that sustains genealogical, ecological, and digital ties. Focusing on sonic, educational, and digital rhythms, we show how protectors (kiaʻi) generated a temporal–spatial resonance and continuity that resisted colonial incursions while sustaining Indigenous rhythm. Drawing from mele (song), oli (chant), ritual practice, and livestreamed digitality, we trace how civic rhythms animated affective resonances of mālie (beauty) and māfana (emotional warmth), binding protectors to ʻāina (land), ancestors, and each other. Rhythm here functions as Indigenous infrastructure: a patterned, reciprocal, and embodied practice that weaves together ecology, ancestry, and Indigeneity through civic rhythms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ka‘ili et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: