Investigates flood-risk cognition in peasant households, indicating key influences for disaster education.
Against the backdrop of recurrent flood hazards, flood-risk cognition has become an important factor influencing disaster prevention decisions. The flood-risk cognition level of peasant households is related to rural sustainable development and land use patterns in the corresponding region. In this study, a structural equation model (SEM)-based empirical analysis of the flood-risk cognition features and the influencing factors was carried out based on survey data obtained from 685 peasant households with flood threats in southwestern China. The results showed the following: (1) The overall flood-risk cognition of these households was moderate to high. Although 70.22% of the respondents showed a positive attitude toward flood prevention, their pre-disaster preparedness awareness remained insufficient. (2) Pre-disaster preparedness awareness, in-disaster response awareness, and post-disaster restoration awareness had significant positive effects on flood-risk cognition. Specifically, post-disaster restoration awareness mediated the effect of disaster response awareness on flood-risk cognition, disaster response awareness mediated the effect of pre-disaster preparedness awareness on flood-risk cognition, and pre-disaster preparedness awareness moderated the relationship between post-disaster restoration awareness and flood-risk cognition. (3) Clarity of defence knowledge, familiarity with secondary disasters of floods, willingness to evacuate under flood threats, self-ability to solve life difficulties, and mitigation attitudes were important factors influencing flood-risk cognition. (4) Female households outperformed males in flood-risk cognition, and households in Jingyang District showed optimal flood-risk cognition. These findings are significant for the promotion of education regarding disaster prevention and for optimising risk assurance policies in rural areas in southwestern China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: