Key result
Review explores clinical applications, interpretability, limitations, and UK regulatory frameworks for perioperative AI models.
Why the study?
Artificial intelligence is increasingly influencing perioperative care, requiring improved clinician understanding of how AI systems function, fail, and should be governed to support safe and ethical adoption.
This narrative review outlines the clinical applications, interpretability, and regulatory governance of AI models in perioperative care to support their safe and ethical adoption.
Emphasizes need for explainable AI and regulatory oversight in perioperative care; leaves open prospective validation before adoption.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly influencing perioperative care by enhancing decision support, resource management, documentation, image analysis and patient safety. This article presents a narrative conceptual review of four commonly encountered AI model types: random forests, support vector machines, convolutional neural networks and large language models. It explores their clinical applications, interpretability, limitations and relevance to perioperative and surgical settings. Particular emphasis is placed on model explainability, evaluation metrics such as accuracy, F1 score and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, hallucination risk and the challenges associated with opaque ‘black box’ systems, including non-interpretable algorithmic frameworks. The discussion is contextualised within the UK’s regulatory and governance frameworks, including the National Health Service Digital clinical safety standards, Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency requirements, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence evaluation tiers and data protection under UK General Data Protection Regulation. By improving clinician understanding of how AI systems function, fail and should be governed, this article aims to support informed, safe and ethical adoption of AI technologies in perioperative environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kevin Patrick Cairns (2026) conducted a review in Perioperative care. Artificial intelligence models was evaluated. This narrative review explores the clinical applications, interpretability, and limitations of AI models in perioperative care, contextualized within UK regulatory and governance frameworks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: