Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis examines CRP levels in patients with respiratory viral co-detection, suggesting age and virus type are crucial context factors.
Objectives: To determine whether patient age and viral composition provide more informative context than detected target number alone for interpreting same-day C-reactive protein (CRP) profiles when multiple respiratory viruses are detected. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 19,002 same-day respiratory multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–serum CRP episodes collected at a Korean tertiary care hospital from October 2008 to December 2024. Episodes were classified as PCR-not-detected, single-virus detection, or viral co-detection. Among virus-positive episodes, associations with log-transformed CRP were evaluated using adjusted regression, leave-one-virus-out analyses, and a complete-panel mixed-effects model accounting for viral composition and repeated measurements. Results: Unadjusted CRP distributions were similar between single-virus detection and co-detection. After age- and sex-adjustment, co-detection was associated with 11.8% higher CRP. Excluding adenovirus-positive episodes attenuated the estimate to 2.7% (95% CI, −5.8 to 12.0; p = 0.541). In the complete-panel analysis of 1839 episodes from 1636 patients, co-detection was not independently associated with CRP, whereas adenovirus was associated with 75.1% higher CRP. Age group also showed strong graded associations with CRP levels overall. Conclusions: When multiple respiratory viruses are co-detected, same-day CRP profiles are better contextualized by patient age and the specific viral composition than by the number of detected targets alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: