Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 17, 2026Journal of Ethics and Social PhilosophyOpen Access

Disagreeing with Opaqueness

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

XZXinkan Zhao

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

The article critiques a proposed solution to disagreement in metaethics, highlighting the role of speaker conception.

Key Points

  • This article examines the proposal introduced by Stina Björkholm regarding opaque questions in metaethics, arguing against its validity.
  • Critically analyze Björkholm’s arguments on opaque questions
  • Explore ordinary senses of opaqueness related to speaker conception of questions
  • Björkholm’s arguments do not substantiate the existence of opaque questions
  • Opaqueness, related to speaker understanding, offers a valuable insight into resolving disagreement

Cite This Study

Xinkan Zhao (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a59c693a58755010b471b87https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v31i4.6242
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share