Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To develop a self-perceived core competency evaluation scale for otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (ENT-HNS) nurse specialists and test its reliability and validity. Based on theoretical analysis, a literature review, and semi-structured interviews, the item pool was established. A preliminary draft of the scale was formed through two rounds of Delphi expert consultations and a pilot test. From August to October 2024, 450 ENT-HNS nurse specialists from 25 provinces in China were selected using convenience sampling for a formal survey to screen items and test reliability and validity. The final version of the scale contains 30 items in four dimensions: clinical nursing, teaching and management, research and innovation, and professional qualities. The authority coefficients of the two rounds of experts were 0.920 and 0.925, respectively, and the Kendall’s W coefficient was 0.219 and 0.181, respectively (all P < 0.001). After three exploratory factor analyses (EFAs), four common factors were extracted, accounting for 74.543% of the cumulative variance. The results of the revised confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model were χ2/df = 2.416, RMSEA = 0.081, TLI = 0.934, IFI = 0.941, CFI = 0.941, and NFI = 0.904. The item-level content validity index of the scale was 0.846 to 1.00, and the scale-level content validity index was 0.919. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total scale was 0.981, the split-half reliability was 0.941, and the test-retest reliability was 0.995. The core competency evaluation scale for ENT-HNS nurse specialists has good reliability and acceptable validity and is suitable for assessing self-perceived competencies in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: