Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review evaluating safety outcomes of JAK inhibitors in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, implying important safety considerations.
INTRODUCTION: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate real-world safety outcomes associated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched through April 2025. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data according to predefined criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tools. RESULTS: The pooled incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) with JAK inhibitors were 0.42 (95% CI: 0.35-0.50) and 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01-0.05), respectively. The most common AEs included acne (effect size [ES] = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.12-0.16), skin and subcutaneous tissue infections (ES = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09-0.26), and herpes virus infections (ES = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.06-0.09). Compared with anti - interleukin-4/interleukin-13 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors were associated with higher risks of acne, anemia, and creatine kinase elevations. CONCLUSIONS: AEs were common but predominantly mild to moderate. Infections, particularly skin and subcutaneous tissue and herpes virus infections, were among the most frequently reported events. The pooled incidence of SAEs, including cardiovascular events, was low within reported follow-up periods. However, heterogeneity and relatively short follow-up limit conclusions regarding long-term risk. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: CRD42025634423.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: