Rapid urban expansion in Erbil has intensified socio-spatial differentiation between open neighbourhoods and gated residential communities. This study examines social segregation through an integrated framework combining street-network centrality, land-use diversity, and residents social outcomes in Kwestan and New Azadi. Spatial Design Network Analysis (sDNA) was used to measure betweenness and closeness/NQPD centrality at 400 m, 800 m, and 2000 m radii; land-use diversity was assessed using the Shannon entropy index; and a semantic differential survey was administered to 180 residents, equally divided between the two neighbourhoods. Results show that the non-gated Kwestan neighbourhood achieved higher network centrality, with BtE400 reaching 1408.9 compared with 106.9 in New Azadi, and BtE800 reaching 8986.6 compared with 472.4. Kwestan recorded higher land-use diversity (H = 0.81) than New Azadi (H = 0.53). Survey findings indicated stronger casual encounters, neighbour interaction, and service accessibility in Kwestan. Correlation analysis revealed positive associations between closeness/NQPD and social interaction (r = 0.299, p = 0.004) and sense of belonging (r = 0.259, p = 0.014). The findings suggest that permeable, mixed-use neighbourhoods can support social integration while strengthening economic vitality through improved accessibility, walkability, and local service distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashnaitar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: