Key result
Ranolazine had a minimal effect on disease-specific health status and quality of life over 12 months among patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does ranolazine improve disease-specific health status and quality of life in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes?
Population
6560 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes
Comparison
Ranolazine vs Placebo
Design
RCT, randomized, double-blind
Follow-up
12 months
Authors
Loading...
Ranolazine yields minimal QOL gains in ACS overall; does not support routine use but extends evidence for benefit limited to prior angina.
RCT (n=6,560)
Double-blind
randomized
Does ranolazine improve disease-specific health status and quality of life in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes?
p-value: p=<0.05
Ranolazine provides minimal overall quality of life improvement in patients with NSTE-ACS, but may offer modest benefits in angina frequency and quality of life for those with pre-existing angina.
Arnold et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (n=6,560). Ranolazine vs. placebo was evaluated on angina frequency and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-QOL (p=<0.05). Ranolazine had a minimal effect on disease-specific health status and quality of life over 12 months among patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: